\n<\/p>\n
\t\t\t\t\t2<\/i><\/p>\n
Juventus find themselves in a precarious position. As much as the immediate question surrounds Igor Tudor\u2019<\/strong>s job security, the true cost of any decision may extend far beyond the dressing room\u2014and into the club\u2019s fragile financial ecosystem.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n According to Calciomercato<\/em><\/strong>, the prospect of Tudor\u2019s dismissal is being weighed not just in sporting terms but under the lens of UEFA\u2019s Financial Fair Play (FFP) scrutiny.<\/p>\n The article highlights that terminating Tudor would come with a heavy burden: his contract extension until 2027, combined with the residual obligations linked to former coach Thiago Motta, means that Juventus could face roughly \u20ac20 million<\/em> in committed costs for two coaches not actively working<\/em>.\u00a0<\/p>\n <\/p>\n What makes this even more significant is that UEFA\u2019s ARE actively monitoring Juventus\u2019 books. The inclusion of termination payments, redundant staff contracts and mounting amortisation charges places extra weight on a club already under financial strain. Calciomercato stress that every euro<\/em> spent on a make-or-break coaching change now risks triggering FFP alarms.<\/p>\n In other words, the decision whether to sack Tudor isn\u2019t just a question of form or identity\u2014it\u2019s an accounting one. If Juventus opts for a change, they must consider the direct hit to their budget and<\/em> how it might aggravate pending FFP investigations. The club\u2019s management now navigate a narrow path: either give Tudor time to turn things around, or risk financial consequences that could compound their sporting woes.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Kaustubh Pandey I GIFN<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n